Share a link
Every project gets its own feedback page. Put it in an email, a tweet, your docs, your app’s help menu. People write, you collect.
One flat price. Unlimited users, always.
Share one link, or drop a widget inside your app. Collect what your users tell you, sort it, and run voting rounds that give you a real answer. One flat price, however many people show up.
Built by Christina, who also runs Amazing Marvin and has spent years trying to keep up with feedback from thousands of users.




Sound familiar?
Feedback tools were built for product teams with a budget line for product tools. If you’re two people and a Stripe account, the math stops making sense right around the time people actually start using your app.
How it works
No integration project, no implementation call. Send a link or paste a snippet, and feedback starts arriving.
Every project gets its own feedback page. Put it in an email, a tweet, your docs, your app’s help menu. People write, you collect.
Drop one snippet into your app and people can leave feedback right where they hit the problem, without being sent off to a portal they have to sign into.
Put feedback into your own categories as it arrives. When you actually need an answer, open a voting round and ask.
A browser extension is next on the list, so you can grab feedback from wherever you happen to find it.
The bit nobody else does
Every other tool gives you the same thing: one permanent board where whatever got the most upvotes stays on top. Which sounds fair, until you live with it.
And in between rounds, the open field stays open, because the most useful thing a user ever says is usually not on your list.
Templates
Most tools hand you a logo slot and one accent color, and everything else stays theirs. Honeycomb comes with a set of real templates. Pick one, make it yours, put it on your own domain.
The math
Say you’re solo, you’ve got around a thousand people using your app, and some of them might leave feedback or vote. Here is what that costs, from each company’s own pricing page.
| Tool | How they charge | Free plan | Cost at ~1,000 users |
|---|---|---|---|
| HoneycombYou are here | Flat monthly price, end users never metered | Yes, 50 pieces of feedback a month with unlimited people leaving them | $19/mo |
| Cannyscales with your users | Per tracked user, meaning anyone tied to a piece of feedback or a vote | Yes, 25 tracked users, then it upgrades you to a paid tier unless you set a spend limit | $529/mo annually, $661/mo monthly |
| Productboard | Per "maker" seat, with a minimum seat count on paid plans | Yes: 1 maker, 500 feedback notes, 1 portal | From $118/mo ($59/maker, 2-maker minimum) |
| Featurebase | Per staff seat, end users not metered | Yes, 1 seat | $29/mo for one seat |
| Aha! Ideas | Per user seat | No, 30-day trial only | From $117/mo (3-user minimum) |
Not everyone is expensive. Featurebase, Nolt and Upvoty charge a flat fee too, and Featurebase runs a generous early-stage startup discount. If all you need is a board with upvotes on it, they are fine, and I’d rather say that than pretend otherwise.
What none of them gives you is a time-boxed voting round: a budget of points per person, spread across the options you chose, closing on a date. Aha! Ideas comes closest. It can cap how many votes each person gets to spread around, but that allowance just sits there rather than belonging to a round that opens and shuts. That is the part that changes what you learn.
And none of it gets more expensive because your app did well.
Prices taken from each vendor’s public pricing page on 25 August 2026. They change, so check before you rely on them. Honeycomb’s own price is what it will launch at.
Pricing
No per-user math, no per-project fee, no seat minimum, no quote call. If your app takes off, or you ship a second one, your feedback bill stays exactly where it was.
The whole product, one flat price
or $15/month billed yearly
One plan, billed monthly or yearly. No per-user pricing, no seat minimums, no sales call.
Why I built Honeycomb
I run another startup called Amazing Marvin, a productivity app for people with ADHD and anyone who struggles to stay organized. The product became popular, which was amazing. But with popularity came opinions. Lots of them.
Soon I was drowning. Thousands of notes scattered across emails, support tickets, and community channels. We’ve always believed in listening to our users. It’s core to who we are. But it became completely unmanageable.
The hardest part? Knowing what actually mattered. Some users are just louder than others, but that doesn’t mean they represent the majority. With hundreds of customizable features, every user had different needs. How do you make sense of it all?
The tools we tried were expensive and didn’t really help us analyze anything. The insights were still buried in there. It was just tedious to find them.
That’s when the idea for Honeycomb was born. I wanted a tool that actually makes sense of feedback chaos, something I wish I’d had years ago.

Put one link in front of your users, or drop the widget into your app, and start collecting what they actually think. However many of them there are.